www.gt4dc.co.uk http://gt4dc.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Mario's rear subframe teflon bushings: problem ?!? http://gt4dc.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3070 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Mario's rear subframe teflon bushings: problem ?!? |
Any one else with Mario's teflon bushing for rear SUBFRAME ? I was trying to replace mine yesterday, but I discovered this "little" difference: what do you think? ![]() Ciao! |
Author: | Meurz [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Is the car standing on its wheels in that pic? |
Author: | two_OH_five [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
It would look about right if you peeled the existing rubber mount off of it's metal backplate It's a bit hard to see, is the top flat? The upper rubber mount is actually a cup kind of thing so it might fit over the top of the new bushing |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Meurz wrote: Is the car standing on its wheels in that pic?
Yes Mate... |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
two_OH_five wrote: It would look about right if you peeled the existing rubber mount off of it's metal backplate
It's a bit hard to see, is the top flat? The upper rubber mount is actually a cup kind of thing so it might fit over the top of the new bushing Don't know... will check soon! Btw, looking at the epc, there is no rubber mount over the stock rubber bushing... Thanks... |
Author: | two_OH_five [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
It is there in the EPC but it's not obvious If you look HERE where I stripped the rear subframe there's some shots of the main mounting points with ![]() and without ![]() the washers part number is 52272-20030 STOPPER, REAR SUSPENSION MEMBER, UPPER Unfortunately I don't have a picture of the underside to show. It has a stup in the centre which slides over the metal insert in the centre of the standard subframe bushing, then a gap then a ring of rubber which contacts the circular part of the subframe itself To be honest I doubt if it matters if you remove that washer and use Marios bushings directly against the chassis. The difference will not be very large and you'll only lower the rear (the correct way without buggering roll centres) by 5 or 6 mm |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
two_OH_five wrote: It is there in the EPC but it's not obvious
If you look HERE where I stripped the rear subframe there's some shots of the main mounting points with ![]() and without ![]() the washers part number is 52272-20030 STOPPER, REAR SUSPENSION MEMBER, UPPER Unfortunately I don't have a picture of the underside to show. It has a stup in the centre which slides over the metal insert in the centre of the standard subframe bushing, then a gap then a ring of rubber which contacts the circular part of the subframe itself To be honest I doubt if it matters if you remove that washer and use Marios bushings directly against the chassis. The difference will not be very large and you'll only lower the rear (the correct way without buggering roll centres) by 5 or 6 mm Ok, now I hope I understand what you meant.... would be very difficult even in Italian to explain and understand via Internet! ![]() Mario's bushings already have nylon cAp for the nylon cUp (like the stock rubber bushing, the lower rubber cUp and the rubber cAp that goes up, against the chassis). The fact is that, as you told and as seen in my pic, the thickness is different: yes, I'll lower the rear, that way, but I will also reduce the clearance between the carbon DS (diameter way bigger than stock) and the chassis... and I already removed a chassis reinforcement, under the handbrake lever, because it touched the DS... Thanks a lot! |
Author: | two_OH_five [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:41 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Here's a quick artists impression of what I think you have I guess you might have to get some spacers made up to suit ![]() But it might do this ![]() Difficult to tell without seeing pictures of the top of it! |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:47 am ] |
Post subject: | |
two_OH_five wrote: Here's a quick artists impression of what I think you have
I guess you might have to get some spacers made up to suit ![]() Yes sure, but only difference is that the rubber OVER the subframe has not the same thickness (as it appears on your draw) of the nylon spacer... BTW Mario just replied me he's on holiday, and will help asap... |
Author: | two_OH_five [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:55 am ] |
Post subject: | |
To me the rubber looks the same size as the bushing The rubber has a metal backing plate attached though (this is what presses against the chassis) and I think it's this that makes the difference in the thickness |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:08 am ] |
Post subject: | |
two_OH_five wrote: To me the rubber looks the same size as the bushing
No no, it's this the problem!!! They have not the same thickness! ![]() |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
two_OH_five wrote: To me the rubber looks the same size as the bushing
The rubber has a metal backing plate attached though (this is what presses against the chassis) and I think it's this that makes the difference in the thickness Ah ok, now I understand your point of view! there is not any metal plate against the chassis, all you see, and it seems to be divided in two parts, it's all one piece of rubber.... |
Author: | two_OH_five [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | |
it may not be obvious but the rubber is stuck on to a circular metal backing plate. You van just see it in the photo and it should be clear in the diagrams I think you'll need to make up a metal spacer to replicate that so that Marios bush + spacer is the same thickness as the stock rubber bush on its backplate |
Author: | Wolf_Tm [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:17 am ] |
Post subject: | |
two_OH_five wrote: I think you'll need to make up a metal spacer to replicate that so that Marios bush + spacer is the same thickness as the stock rubber bush on its backplate Yes, I think this too... On the ST185 forum someone just wrote that ST185 has lower than ST205 rubber bushing on top... touche' ![]() |
Author: | two_OH_five [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:32 am ] |
Post subject: | |
might be an easy place to create a few mm of extra clearance |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |