www.gt4dc.co.uk
Maintain, Modify and DRIVE your GT-Four


It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:05 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 147 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:41 pm 
Offline
Group N
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Parma - Italy
Car Model: None
Diceman wrote:
IIRC the only camber bolts available for ST185 (which can be used for ST205 rears) are the Whiteline and IMHO don't tick the "good" box from a quality angle.



Sorry.... my English...

are you saying that camber bolts are not going to give me correct and/or enough adjustment ?

Wolf

_________________
Wolf_Tm
TM 250 enduro 2 stroke
GT-four ST205 Snowy White with selfmade 3SGTE v4.1 - [2.34kg/bhp DynoDynamics]
http://www.youtube.com/WolfTm250
http://www.facebook.com/wolf.tm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:12 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 3484
Location: On Top
Car Model: None
They provide adjustment but quality is not great.

_________________
JP
GT4DC Treasurer

Grey St185 RC
Silver BMW E46 M3
Multicolour yawn Honda VFR400
Silver Honda Civic Type-R


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:19 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:06 am
Posts: 4743
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Car Model: ST205
My chassis builder prefers to fit adjustable top mounts rather than camber bolts. Its a better solution as it makes adjustment easier.

_________________
Don
GT4DC Chairman
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205WRC JDM 269bhp @ 0.9bar
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four Special GT 590bhp @ 1.8bar
1989 Van Diemen RF88/89 Formula Ford 1600
2008 Nissan Patrol GU 3.0L ZD30DDTi 154bhp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:25 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:14 am
Posts: 3265
Location: Camberley, Surrey
Car Model: ST205
I also remember DataJon mentioning something about the way in which the bolts alter the camber.

Apparently it introduces a side loading on the damper piston and housing which can result in premature failure.

Anyone remember the specifics?

_________________
GT4DC Events Co-ordinator
1996 ST205 UK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:53 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
yes.

It's all about thrust vectors. If the face of the wheel is in line with the damper then you can imagine vertical wheel movement results in the same movement at the shaft

If the wheel is inclined relative to the shaft then moving the wheel will introduce a side load onto the shaft. It's hard to describe but quite easy to picture with the aid of props

Anothe thing about camber bolts is they're quite a bit thinner than normal bolts to facilitate the adjustment

However, they are a simple way of adjusting stuff if you do not have adjustability anywhere.

Don, I thought you had adjustable arms, not topmounts.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:27 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:06 am
Posts: 4743
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Car Model: ST205
two_OH_five wrote:
Don, I thought you had adjustable arms, not topmounts.....

Steve, you will be amazed to hear that I can indeed move my arms in and out and round about :mrgreen: Top mounts are front only on my track toy. Most rally cars seem to be built this way. The Corolla WRC had fixed rear top mounts so I suppose all the adjustment was done on the lower wishbones and TCA's

_________________
Don
GT4DC Chairman
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205WRC JDM 269bhp @ 0.9bar
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four Special GT 590bhp @ 1.8bar
1989 Van Diemen RF88/89 Formula Ford 1600
2008 Nissan Patrol GU 3.0L ZD30DDTi 154bhp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:04 pm 
Offline
Group N
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Parma - Italy
Car Model: None
Diceman wrote:
They provide adjustment but quality is not great.



Ok understood, thanks!

BTW... is it possible to fit Adj. top mounts in the rear ?
The hole where the rear top mount sits, seems to be quite small...

_________________
Wolf_Tm
TM 250 enduro 2 stroke
GT-four ST205 Snowy White with selfmade 3SGTE v4.1 - [2.34kg/bhp DynoDynamics]
http://www.youtube.com/WolfTm250
http://www.facebook.com/wolf.tm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:05 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
i don't think anyone makes adjustable ones. Iirc you are correct, normal ”front” adjustable ones do not fit

For a small range of camber adjustment you could just make the non adjustable rear arm adjustable. This would allow some camber change with the front already adjustable arm controlling toe. I think you'd get about half a degree of camber that way.

Otherwise modify both arms to make them adjustable and you can add unlimited adjustment within reason.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:06 pm 
Offline
Junior WRC

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 8:06 pm
Posts: 595
Location: Knoxville, TN USA
Car Model: None
On the note of adjustable rears, why not just get the rear tubular lower arm modified to be adjustable for camber changes? Maybe get the ends filled with a slug, then have them threaded and use a method similar to the tie rod adjustment to change camber.

This was the concept I plan to attempt with my own 205 rear arms.

Image

_________________
Coldiron (Cold - Iron)
1992 Celica Gt4 RC Conv. St205 swap
Image
http://www.noritoy.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:48 pm 
Offline
WRC
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: Austria
Car Model: None
Hi folks,

setting up a chassis is a own science

if you have knowledge you can do it pretty good, but you also can destroy so many

"less is more" is my approach

greetz

_________________
KEEP COOL UNDER PRESSURE
Image
street legal?.....perhaps in tschibuti


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:36 pm 
Offline
Group N
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Parma - Italy
Car Model: None
two_OH_five wrote:
For a small range of camber adjustment you could just make the non adjustable rear arm adjustable. This would allow some camber change with the front already adjustable arm controlling toe. I think you'd get about half a degree of camber that way.

Otherwise modify both arms to make them adjustable and you can add unlimited adjustment within reason.....


cms-gt4 wrote:
On the note of adjustable rears, why not just get the rear tubular lower arm modified to be adjustable for camber changes? Maybe get the ends filled with a slug, then have them threaded and use a method similar to the tie rod adjustment to change camber.

This was the concept I plan to attempt with my own 205 rear arms.

Image



Yes Mates,

I really think this would be the way to go...

Even if I must say -2.5 deg per side is working GREAT in track...
Maybe too well...
today I had a track session and I had not any chance of getting some good oversteer out of turns, even if the engine pulled SO HARD that it was impossible to use the 2nd gear to make turns:
as I touched the gas, the engine was already at the limitter with all the 4 wheels (BS 050 235/40-17) madly spinning!

I think I could try removing uprated front stabilizer bar, and increasing rear height and compression damping to gain some traction in the front.

This said, the BC are FANTASTIC in mountain roads and for daily driving!

_________________
Wolf_Tm
TM 250 enduro 2 stroke
GT-four ST205 Snowy White with selfmade 3SGTE v4.1 - [2.34kg/bhp DynoDynamics]
http://www.youtube.com/WolfTm250
http://www.facebook.com/wolf.tm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:29 am 
Offline
Group N

Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:32 am
Posts: 162
Location: Devon
Car Model: None
cms-gt4 wrote:
On the note of adjustable rears, why not just get the rear tubular lower arm modified to be adjustable for camber changes? Maybe get the ends filled with a slug, then have them threaded and use a method similar to the tie rod adjustment to change camber.

This was the concept I plan to attempt with my own 205 rear arms.

Image


You will need to replace the threaded section with a piece with opposed threads on it. ie. left and right hand threads so that you can make small adjustments while the rod ends are still attached to the car. It also would mean that you are not restricted to a half turn at each adjustment but can dial in as much or as little as you need! :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
If you look at the "track weapon chassis" thread there's an example ot what to do

IMO the stock arms are too thin to safely plug. I think you'd have to sleeve them with a thicker tube then use that to weld in plugs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:05 am 
Offline
Group N
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Parma - Italy
Car Model: None
Sirius wrote:

Apparently it introduces a side loading on the damper piston and housing which can result in premature failure.



Yes, it makes a sense...

so it's the same for the front camber plates from Fensport ?

_________________
Wolf_Tm
TM 250 enduro 2 stroke
GT-four ST205 Snowy White with selfmade 3SGTE v4.1 - [2.34kg/bhp DynoDynamics]
http://www.youtube.com/WolfTm250
http://www.facebook.com/wolf.tm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:15 am 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 pm
Posts: 4067
Location: drinking devil fuel
Car Model: ST205
no...

The superstrut setup on the front is rather different as the shock is effectivly decoupled from the wheel axis. You could in effect add 45 degrees camber and the shock would still only be vertically loaded. There may be other bad side effects though :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 147 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group