www.gt4dc.co.uk
Maintain, Modify and DRIVE your GT-Four


It is currently Tue Oct 07, 2025 12:06 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
Group N
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Parma - Italy
Car Model: None
Chris-de-Bear wrote:
I would say that increased flow would give less thermal gradient across the engine (out temp - in temp) which should be beneficial - so long as turbulance and cavitation don't become an issue.

Radiator efficiency shouldn't be reduced as the same proportion should go via radiator or bypass. If anything, faster flow should make the transfer of heat from engine block to radiator core more efficient.



Yes correct...

main advantage would be the less thermal gradient...

_________________
Wolf_Tm
TM 250 enduro 2 stroke
GT-four ST205 Snowy White with selfmade 3SGTE v4.1 - [2.34kg/bhp DynoDynamics]
http://www.youtube.com/WolfTm250
http://www.facebook.com/wolf.tm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:14 pm 
Offline
WRC
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: Austria
Car Model: None
Hi,

two_OH_five, can you send me your e-mail adress

Wolf_Tm, i have the cooler in the "transmission oil system", only as gearbox cooler
a other question, is it possible that you have TTE ST205 documents like my explosion pictures with part number etc.?

greetz

_________________
KEEP COOL UNDER PRESSURE
Image
street legal?.....perhaps in tschibuti


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:44 am 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:10 pm
Posts: 1953
Location: Sunny Fareham, UK
Car Model: ST205
I think DJ did this and I pointed out that with this setup there is no opposition to flow i.e. no pressure, and so the true flow of the pump in the engine cannt be calculated, unless you put in all the oppositions to flow e.g. Block, head, radiator, thermostat etc

I think I have his calculations somewhere if this would be useful?

Edit...
Great to see some forward thinking by people! A bit of research is always a good thing! :)

_________________
Kris
95 ST205 - slept for 10 years, now waking up...
Avensis
http://www.gtfours.co.uk
_______________________________________
Turbocharging - the replacement for displacement


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:19 am 
Offline
Group N
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Parma - Italy
Car Model: None
Sunny wrote:
Wolf_Tm, i have the cooler in the "transmission oil system", only as gearbox cooler



Yes, I do know that is there, but:
- it would be quite a BIG exchanger, just for transmission...
- I do know they use a engine oil/water exchanger
- in the parts list file, the AM 65779 cooler is listed as "engine/gearbox" heat exchanger

So...

Quote:
a other question, is it possible that you have TTE ST205 documents like my explosion pictures with part number etc.?


ST205 (207f) and Corolla (260f)? Yes

_________________
Wolf_Tm
TM 250 enduro 2 stroke
GT-four ST205 Snowy White with selfmade 3SGTE v4.1 - [2.34kg/bhp DynoDynamics]
http://www.youtube.com/WolfTm250
http://www.facebook.com/wolf.tm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:50 pm 
Offline
WRC
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: Austria
Car Model: None
Hi

Kris, i can't can measure the true flow through the engine like you said, i do the test simple with the same conditions and calculate how much percentage the flow raise -> we will see the result

Wolf, do you want to send me the data? :)
gasthof-hackl@gmuendnet.at

greetz

_________________
KEEP COOL UNDER PRESSURE
Image
street legal?.....perhaps in tschibuti


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:40 pm 
Offline
Group N
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Parma - Italy
Car Model: None
Sunny wrote:

Wolf, do you want to send me the data? :)
gasthof-hackl@gmuendnet.at


I think your TTE friend already gave you:

Sunny wrote:
i can send you explosion pictures from corolla WRC if you want them

_________________
Wolf_Tm
TM 250 enduro 2 stroke
GT-four ST205 Snowy White with selfmade 3SGTE v4.1 - [2.34kg/bhp DynoDynamics]
http://www.youtube.com/WolfTm250
http://www.facebook.com/wolf.tm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:42 pm 
Offline
WRC
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: Austria
Car Model: None
Hi,

yes, from Corolla, but not from the ST205 :)

greetz

_________________
KEEP COOL UNDER PRESSURE
Image
street legal?.....perhaps in tschibuti


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:50 pm 
Offline
WRC
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: Austria
Car Model: None
Hi,

today i got the pump-housing back from machining

-2mm should give a axial-clearance of 0,5mm

[img][img]http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/2140/wasserpumpenupgrade3.jpg[/img][/IMG]

and then he told me that he also machined the back side to become a correct seat in the machine
problem: the o-ring....i hope that all is ok without any leaks

Image

greetz

_________________
KEEP COOL UNDER PRESSURE
Image
street legal?.....perhaps in tschibuti


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:09 pm 
Offline
Club Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:06 am
Posts: 4743
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Car Model: ST205
Are you planning on testing this to see what difference the reduced clearance makes to the flow rates?

_________________
Don
GT4DC Chairman
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205WRC JDM 269bhp @ 0.9bar
1994 Toyota Celica GT-Four Special GT 590bhp @ 1.8bar
1989 Van Diemen RF88/89 Formula Ford 1600
2008 Nissan Patrol GU 3.0L ZD30DDTi 154bhp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:07 pm 
Offline
WRC
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: Austria
Car Model: None
Hi,

Don, correct
less axial-clearance = less flow from the pressure side back to the intake side of the pump (efficiency)

and here is the result:

the pump do actual 7,9L/min which means +1,5L/min against 6,4L/min OEM spec

a plus of 23% -> job done

be warned, tighten the screws carefull, i destroyed one thread as the wall of the pump housing is thin against OEM

greetz

_________________
KEEP COOL UNDER PRESSURE
Image
street legal?.....perhaps in tschibuti


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group